But in an online world, campaign funding can buy more powerful kinds of advantageespecially by enabling the targeting of individual voters based on their social media and related profiles. This is dangerous hubris. The result was a heartening increase in the number of countries that could be described as democratic.
To be truly democratic, elections have to be both free and fair. In a pre-internet era, lavish funding could buy advantages for particular political groups — more and better TV advertising in the US, for example; high-quality print and billboard advertising; resources for supporting leafleting, canvassing, getting out the vote; and so on.
And the requisite databases can be constructed way before a campaign begins, which is why that kind of expenditure is not seen by the Electoral Commission and why campaign financing by foreign interests may stay invisible.
Western societies regard themselves as immune to this illiberal trend, on the assumption that their electoral systems are beyond reproach. But in the past few years, the trend has reversed: Share via Email Donald Trump made much of the fact that he was, supposedly, running on his own money and beholden to no one.
Over the past century, millions of people have braved violence, intimidation and other obstacles to demand the right to express their will through the ballot box. It is unlikely that the outcome of the referendum was determined solely by online campaigning, but there is now a technological arms race under way.
Popular revulsion at the dysfunctional Congress that is the result of this skewed funding was one of the factors that led to the election of Donald Trumpa candidate who made much of the fact that he was, supposedly, running on his own money and beholden to no one. A tech-savvy Electoral Reform Commission would be a good place to start.
Fairness requires that electoral contests take place on a level playing field, yet in the past two decades that field has become dangerously tilted by the influence of campaign funding.
But the combination of uncontrolled campaign funding and digital technology poses worrying problems for democracy. The UK has ostensibly strict rules on campaign funding administered by the Electoral Commissionwhich is charged with ensuring the income and spending of campaigners is transparent, controlling the sources of political funding and limiting spending at elections and referendums.Mar 01, · He served as the editorial page editor of the International Herald Tribune in Paris from to He has been a Times correspondent and bureau chief in Moscow, Bonn, Jerusalem and the United.
Find out more about the editorial board for Political Geography. EDITORIAL: Primary day is almost here — Here's what you need to know to vote said Chris Whitmire, a spokesman for the South Carolina Election Commission. Technically, voters can write in.
Read the well-informed political editorials at the Washington Times and stay engaged in what promises to be an interesting year.
The punditry insists, as always, that every election. The Observer view on ‘free and fair’ elections Observer editorial.
at the dysfunctional Congress that is the result of this skewed funding was one of the factors that led to the election. Editorial: Don't let Presidential race keep you from voting For quite a few people, they've long had their minds made up that they are going to.Download