An argument that language is a virus

This section needs additional citations for verification. The sensation S[ edit ] Wittgenstein sets up a thought experiment in which someone is imagined to associate some recurrent sensation with a symbol by writing S in their calendar when the sensation occurs.

Dawkins stresses his claim that religious beliefs do not spread as a result of evidence in their support, but typically by cultural transmission, in most cases from parents or from charismatic individuals. July Learn how and when to remove this template message One common interpretation is that the possibility exists that one might misremember the sensation, and therefore one does not have any firm criterion for using S in each case.

If you quote or link to something for the purpose of starting a debate, you must provide your own argument for or against it. Wittgenstein explains this unintelligibility with a series of analogies. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. July Learn how and when to remove this template message Another interpretation, found for example in the account presented by Anthony Kenny [11] has it that the problem with a private ostensive definition is not just that it might be misremembered, but that such a definition cannot lead to a meaningful statement.

That is, in the case of a public language there An argument that language is a virus other ways to check the use of a term that has been ostensively defined. One can say something like "She did X because of the rule R" but if you say "She followed R because of the rule R1" one can then ask "but why did she follow rule R1?

In this ordinary language case, it makes sense to ask questions such as "is this the tree we named T yesterday? Further Dawkins distinguishes this process from the spread of scientific ideas, which, he suggests, is constrained by the requirement to conform with certain virtues of standard methodology: If they were depending entirely on their memory, and had not written down the location of the tree, or told anyone else, then they would appear to be with the same difficulties as the individual who defined S ostensively.

This would have profound implications for other areas of philosophical and psychological study. The content of the box is irrelevant to whatever language game it is used in. We ask you to refrain from addressing the sub in this manner without first receiving approval from the mods.

But furthermore, if any other sort of utterance does not admit of doubt, it must be senseless.

MODERATORS

Filter posts by subject. It is impelled by some deep, inner conviction that something is true, or right, or virtuous: Wittgenstein argues, in his later work, that this account of private language is inconsistent. Any post or comment that argues that an entire religion or cultural group commits actions or holds beliefs that would cause reasonable people to consider violence justified against the group as a whole will be removed.

Philosophical Investigations The argument is found in part one of the Philosophical investigations. If the idea of a private language is inconsistent, then a logical conclusion would be that all language serves a social function.

The beetle-in-a-box[ edit ] The beetle-in-a-box is a famous thought experiment that Wittgenstein introduces in the context of his investigation of pains. And so, if this is the case, the argument presented against private language would apply equally to public language.

Explanation must have an end. Similarly, one might say S while focusing on a sensation, but no act of naming has occurred. There is a conviction that "mystery", per se, is a good thing; the belief that it is not a virtue to solve mysteries but to enjoy them and revel in their insolubility.

The sense has vanished with the doubt. Alternatively, one might take a behaviorist line and claim that our pains are merely neurological stimulations accompanied by a disposition to behave. What a private language is[ edit ] If someone were to behave as if they understood a language of which no-one else can make sense, we might call this an example of a private language.

By offering the "beetle" as an analogy to pains, Wittgenstein suggests that the case of pains is not really amenable to the uses philosophers would make of it.

Our consciousness, of pains anyway, would seem unassailable. Participation in a public form of life enables correction to occur. For Wittgenstein, tautologies do not have sense, do not say anything, and so do not admit of doubt.

Memory scepticism[ edit ] This section has multiple issues. As such, all users are expected to assign themselves appropriate and honest flair in order to avoid comment removal. But this is the very thing being questioned.

Let us first consider a case of ostensive definition in a public language.

Private language argument

Therefore, following a rule cannot be a private activity. The other, called meaning scepticism, has it that one can never be sure of the meaning of a term defined in this way.

He famously suggests that any act can be made out to follow from a given rule. Significance[ edit ] The private language argument is of central importance to debates about the nature of language. But I can match my concepts to a word in our common language, and then speak the word.

Hence, to appeal to a private ostensive definition as the standard of correct use of a term would be "as if someone were to buy several copies of the morning paper to assure himself that what it said was true.The private language argument argues that a language understandable by only a single individual is incoherent, and was introduced by Ludwig Wittgenstein in his later work, especially in the Philosophical Investigations.

The argument was central to philosophical discussion in the second half of the 20th century. All posts must either contain an argument or ask a question that could lead to debate. Either way, you must state your own views on the matter in the body of every post.

All Is religion a language virus? (mint-body.comReligion) submitted 4 years ago * by [deleted]. Science Inquiry, Argument and Language A Case for the Science Writing Heuristic Edited by Brian M.

Hand University of Iowa, USA SENSE PUBLISHERS ROTTERDAM / TAIPEI. Language is a Virus mint-body.com exists to cure writer's block and inspire creativity. You can choose from a multitude of writing games, gizmos, generators, writing prompts and exercises, tips, experiments and manifestoes from infamous avant garde writers and how-to articles on fiction writing and poetry.

Students will answer the question: Is a virus a living organism? Objectives In this extended writing task, students will read, analyze, and gather relevant information from text(s) and write an argumentative essay.

"Viruses of the Mind" is an essay by British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, first published in the book Dennett and His Critics: Demystifying Mind ().

The concept of language as a virus in The Electronic Revolution by William S. Burroughs; References.

Download
An argument that language is a virus
Rated 3/5 based on 81 review