An argument against the stay of american soldiers in iraq

We have what we believe to be credible information that Iraq and al Qaeda have discussed safe haven opportunities in Iraq, reciprocal nonaggression discussions.

Again, that is Afganistan and Al-Qaeda, not Iraq. They were not ideological allies. The large majority of the Iraqi army was not distinctly loyal to the Baathist party, and it made no sense to completely disband it. Note how I said that Saddam was a brutal dictator in the beginning of my first statement.

We have what we consider to be credible evidence that al Qaeda leaders have sought contacts in Iraq who could help them acquire weapon of -- weapons of mass destruction capabilities Third, "billions that would die from a nuke attack?

I created the debate. I was arguing that there needed to be more thansoldiers in Iraq at the onset…I also argued that there should be a troop increase accompanied with a time table for withdrawal…the counterinsurgency doctrine is "old information" from Bosnia in the 90s, which makes it all the more amazing that people would ignore it.

The children of Iraq turned into soldiers, brainwashed, murdered, raped, etc. If we did not intervene when we did, then Iraq would have used those WMDs on us. Why are you telling me to stay on topic?

Each has groups and people in their countries which were classified as terrorist organization. A second worry is that factual confusion amongst Canadians who are against allowing these conscientious objectors to stay will be used as a political shield by the government.

Unfortunately, so far his Liberal government is not showing leadership on this issue. What is your point? Second, that link to "Fair and Balanced" Fox New says virtually nothing. The reports of these contacts have been increasing since Iraq was a secular Islamic country and Al-Qaeda wants to establish an Islamic Caliphate throughout the region.

Again, how do you know they would have used them? Also, one could make the argument that during the sectarian phase, these exact same actions happened. This led many communities to turn to Shiite militias for protection against looters, and increased militia power in Iraq. Anyway, the Iraq War is still necessary.

The militias were created in the power vacuum left after Saddam Hussein was deposed. After two tours in Iraq, Walcott, who now lives in Peterborough, Ont. If we did not attack when we did, then we would have to attack later after we were nuked and the international prestige would be lowered then.

I already addressed that article. Al-Qaeda attacked us, Iraq had nothing to do with Al-Qaeda. First of all, why would Iraq have used nuclear or chemical weapons on the United States?

To make this situation even worse, U.

Access Denied

Unfortunately, when it comes to moral questions touching on war, a pattern is developing of the Liberal government acting as obsequiously in its relationship to America as the previous Conservatives. And when I say contacts, I mean between Iraq and al Qaeda.

I think we all know you better now. In actuality, during the Vietnam War, resisters were both draft dodgers and deserters who had enlisted voluntarily. You have yet to offer a distinct connection between the two.

The Iraqi National Archive, was set ablaze destroying virtually everything inside even documents that were seven thousand years old. Most notably, we need asylum as an expression of solidarity with those who dare resist warrior culture gone amok, and to affirm that humanitarianism and compassion can triumph over militarism and manifest abuse of power.

If you want all of our hard American work to go down the toilet then half do the job but if you want us to get out of Iraq as quickly as possible then we need to stay in Iraq and tke out the insurgency with as much force as necessary.

Iraq is not Afghanistan. It would have sealed the fate of Iraq both by the US and the international community. Dean Walcott is seen with his wife and two of his Canadian-born children in Toronto on Friday, July 22, Iraq could hardly be a clearer cautionary tale: if the U.S.

withdraws from Afghanistan before Afghan security forces are fully prepared to lead the fight against the Taliban and deny safe haven to. Related Links Overview/Background Saddam Hussein has run a brutal dictatorship of the country of Iraq for over 20 years.

He has started wars against neighboring countries of Iran and Kuwait, leading to the death of about million Muslims. While the military component of this investment need not be large, it is critical to shoring up Iraq’s nascent armed forces against extremist threats.

Contrary to popular belief and media opinion, I believe that the U.S. becoming involved in the Vietnam war was a justified action to take.

Initially, the North and South were divided with communism reigning in the North and capitalism in South Vietnam.

War in Iraq

Argument Essay War In Iraq. school February 24, Result of Iraq War In March 20,the Iraq War was an invasion force led by the United States. In the beginning, the government led by George W. Bush claimed that this military operation was necessary in order to attack terrorism and eliminate the extensive chemical weapons.

If you want all of our hard American work to go down the toilet then half do the job but if you want us to get out of Iraq as quickly as possible then we need to stay in Iraq and tke out the insurgency with as much force as necessary.

Download
An argument against the stay of american soldiers in iraq
Rated 3/5 based on 50 review